I have already accepted the fact that my little guy will eventually wizz on me at some point in his infancy. Anatomically speaking, for practical diaper changing purposes, baby boys are the universe's ultimate design flaw. They are like revolving doors with a "pull" sign (think about it). They seem harmless enough, but if you don't pay close attention at all times someone's probably gonna get it..."pow, right in the kisser".
In the grand scheme of things, it is a fair trade. I don't have to worry about paying for a wedding, "talking about feelings", or constantly having to fend off prospective young punk suitors. In exchange, I will likely get peed on (please not the face!) and have to teach the boy how to properly throw a ball. I can do this, but I think I might by a welder's mask to limit my exposure to the golden sprinkler.
you know, in china kids pretty much don't wear diapers, they go around crothless and pee and poop everywhere, even on city buses and public grassy areas.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.gadling.com/2007/05/18/a-canadian-in-beijing-naked-baby-bums-everywhere/
so, maybe you could start that trend here.
by "crothless" i meant "crotchless" and by that, i mean, the pants are like little chaps, kinda, not that the children...nevermind
ReplyDeletethe illustration above is pretty much the incorrect way to address anything related to pants, not just diapers. never stick the hand in without peeking first. the fact that this illustration is necessary is further proof that certain people should not be having kids.
ReplyDelete